{"id":30080,"date":"2019-10-06T08:42:54","date_gmt":"2019-10-06T12:42:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/?p=30080"},"modified":"2019-10-06T08:43:00","modified_gmt":"2019-10-06T12:43:00","slug":"op-from-the-ed-gop-insurance-industry-causing-move-toward-single-payer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/?p=30080","title":{"rendered":"Op from the Ed: GOP, Insurance industry causing move toward single-payer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>By Mike McGann<\/strong>, <em>Editor, The Times<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/UTMikeColLogo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10281\" src=\"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/UTMikeColLogo-251x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"251\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a>Do no harm. That is the first precept of modern medical care. This doesn\u2019t mean standing there while someone is bleeding out, of course, which is the current state of American health care.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">I was happy to give Guy Ciarrocchi<i>, <\/i>the president of the Chester County Chamber of Business &amp; Industry, <a href=\"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/?p=30009\">his say<\/a> last week about not expanding government\u2019s role in health care.<\/span><!--more--><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Here\u2019s mine:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">As I was standing at the counter in the Kennett Square Walgreens \u2014 for the second straight day \u2014 trying to figure out why Aetna appeared to have cancelled my health insurance (despite the nearly $2,400 monthly check we send them via an administrator to cover me, my wife and two college kids), I was asking myself: \u201cexactly how much worse could government-run healthcare be?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The truth of the matter, despite Guy\u2019s rather pedestrian GOP playbook histrionics last week, arguably not worse and possibly much better, and yes, cheaper. And, ironically, the greed and short-sightedness of the Republicans and the insurance industry might be driving a quicker move toward single payer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Generally speaking, I\u2019ve been against Medicare For All \u2014 I do think there\u2019s a place for private sector insurance \u2014 but in truth, as Republicans have slowly dismantled the Affordable Care Act (which \u2014 stunner \u2014 actually did lower my family\u2019s health insurance costs, before Republicans in Congress cut off subsidies and tax credits for the program, neutering it), we\u2019re right back where we started, with spiraling costs and health care rationing (when people are skipping does of insulin because of cost, we\u2019re in full-on rationing).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">I have long felt that two concepts: a public option buy-in for Medicare and a Medicare-55 program made a lot of sense as first steps, though.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Yes, we\u2019d have to rework reimbursements for hospitals and doctors (both have been underpaid by Medicare typically, as compared with private insurance PPO rates) \u2014 and we\u2019d have to pay for it. This would prevent hospitals from closing and doctors shutting practices. Still such a move would potentially save them money as they\u2019d see less of an onerous burden of dealing with private insurance companies requirements to jump through hoops to get paid (not to mention how much gets written off when health care providers finally give up when claims are \u201clost\u201d and denied after the fact by insurers).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Here\u2019s how: both programs would have to require a premium of sorts (and I think this could be scaled by income) and yes, we\u2019d have to raise the contribution rate on Medicare in steps beyond the 2013 hike on incomes over $200,000. We could boost rates at $400,000, $1 million and $10 million to boost overall revenue. Additionally, we\u2019d need to allow this newly muscular Medicare to negotiate pricing with drug companies, and finally bring drug pricing on par with other western countries to contain costs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">To be blunt: public insurance will be more cost effective than private insurance \u2014 Medicare overhead is about 4%, while private insurance is closer to 20%. As coverage plans would be pretty universal, it would be easier for providers to figure out what\u2019s covered and what\u2019s not \u2014 no more surprise sticker shock, when one doctor at a provider isn\u2019t in network \u2014 everyone would be in network.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">By taking the 55 to 64 year old people out of the private insurance pool, we should see a drop in costs for private insurance (we should, but I\u2019m dubious, as insurance companies will continue to be more concerned about profit over people\u2019s health care). If the public option is able to win in the marketplace, though, insurers will have little choice, but to drop prices to compete. This, of course, is why they oppose it so strongly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">By allowing small businesses \u2014 and entrepreneurs \u2014 to buy into the government plans, a lot of headaches and cost will go away. Maybe the corporate behemoths might be less impressed, but small business owners in Chester County will benefit greatly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">But I have to admit, in recent weeks, I\u2019m beginning to see my Medicare buy-in\/Medicare-55 plan as half-measures. If we can make the changes needed to do those, frankly, we could move right to single-payer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Raise my taxes? Knock yourself out. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">If my taxes go up $10,000 a year, but insurance drops $24,000 \u2014 I\u2019m ahead, way ahead. If employers no longer have to worry about providing health care and all of the headaches of providing health care \u2014 think of the savings. Even if half of the savings are moved to salary (in part to offset the higher taxes), profitability will increase.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">And here\u2019s another thought: health care costs are one of the big drivers of cost increase for local school districts (about 70% of annual budgets). If all teachers and staff are on a government-run health care system \u2014 we could see sizable drops in real estate taxes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In short, only two groups lose: private insurance companies and rich folks, if this is done right.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Everyone else could win.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">While some insist on an immediate transition to single-payer, I do think my half-measures are a good first step to one, unified system within the next 20 years.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It\u2019s clear that we need to do something, as the current system is not sustainable \u2014 my own health insurance is more than my mortgage, which is sheer lunacy. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Mike McGann, Editor, The Times Do no harm. That is the first precept of modern medical care. This doesn\u2019t mean standing there while someone is bleeding out, of course, which is the current state of American health care. I was happy to give Guy Ciarrocchi, the president of the Chester County Chamber of Business [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30082,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[6269,1476,1733,506,11859,575],"class_list":["post-30080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion","tag-featured","tag-health-care","tag-insurance","tag-republicans","tag-single-payer","tag-taxes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30080"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30080\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30081,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30080\/revisions\/30081"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/30082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chescotimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}